portable web server is under xampp, a search for apache returns some additional results also.
Mike On Apr 17, 2:43 pm, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike et al, > > > I use portablefirefox 3.5 (http://www.portableapps.com) on win2k, > > Too bad they don't have a portable web-server app. That might future- > proof TW. Of course, if you're going to run a web-server, then you > could pick just about any Wiki. > > > Regretfully FF is growing in bloat, but still better > > than IE, and better plugin support than chrome. > > I'm not sure what everyone means by bloat. Any two pieces of software, > given the same specifications, will eventually converge upon a similar > size and usage. As the user base grows, users demand more and more > "must-have" features. Unfortunately one man's "must-have" is another > man's "what's that?" feature. > > > I imagine if all of the major browers close off TW > > save capabilities, one of the great dev's will find a > > work around. . . And HTML5 is in the works which > > should be more future proof (tw5) > > Can we be sure of that? And is there any reason to believe that HTML5 > will be more future-proof, given that javascript will still be a > client-side solution with client-side restrictions? > > Mark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
