> I'm not quite sure why you keep going back to TiddlySpace. You wrote:
> I expect we're going to go off and write our own framework for > single-page applications - because it sure looks a lot easier than > buliding on Tiddly. That's sort of a shame. To which cdent mentioned that non-TiddlyWiki stuff is still possible within (something like) TiddlySpace: > If you're into tiddlers, but not TiddlyWiki, you might have a browse > around http://tiddlyspace.com/, looking at some of the non-tiddlywiki > applications that have been created there. Ben Gillies and Jon Robson > ought to be able to point out some good examples. To which I replied with some examples from TiddlySpace (hence why they all mention TiddlySpace). If the bit you're interested in is TiddlyWiki as an offline, single page wiki, and not tiddlers in general, then none of what I've said is likely to have been of much use to you. That's fine. > If you look at a server-side equivalent - something like WikiMedia, or > Drupal, or WordPress, or perhaps CouchDB, or eXist - the systems have clear, > and clearly documented architectures - it's pretty clear how to write a new > theme, write a new module, access various APIs, write an application on top > of the platform, etc. > > That's pretty much missing for TiddlyWiki - and it's a real obstacle to > anyone who'd actually like to use or extend the platform. Yep. I don't think anyone here disagrees with you on that point. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
