I must look into this thoroughly but from what you describe and after a first peek, your set up seems PERFECT for a concept I'm sketching on to have the community easily contribute things in an unofficial way that may, possibly and if good enough, be transferred to a more official place.
I believe these emerging initiatives will have a great (and positive) impact on the directions of TW and the TW community. Thank you Danielo! This is very exciting! <:-) @Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > I think we need to play with it and explore it a bit before we adopt it as > the official route for documentation contributions. > I think a point with this is that it does not have to be "the" or evan "an" official route for documentation contributions. I imagine these initiatives as adding roads *"towards* official". I'm in full agreement with you Jeremy that tw.com should be the authoritative place for TW. These other things are, in my mind, best seen as a playground for *evolution* of things that might eventually make it to official status. We need a lot of these community paths because the community consists of a plethora of minds that work in different ways and have different preferences and capabilities to contribute. One Rome, many paths. Pax Tiddlum. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
