Dear Arlen, Josiah and Birthe,
you are toughing the topic of my ongoing interest for a few years,
"Findability and Discoverability for Reuse" in Transmedia environment:
http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/104941506/Transmedia
In other words, I study how to bring "experts" and "learners" literally "on
the same page" where all relevant knowledge and information is collected
and arrange for immediate reuse, and how to ensure each particular "page"
found or discovered in "real-time", i.e. as quick as a few seconds.
Different media serve different purposes:
- books are great for putting together well known materials and facts, for
systematic learning
- forums like this are great for sharing ideas with large number of
participants
- messengers are good for real-time "relaxed" communication
- voice and video chats (HangOuts, for example) are used when things
require immediate action
but none of them are made convenient for finding / discovering information
(for future reuse).
>From my experience, for the purpose of (real-time) reuse, any particular
chunk of information or knowledge can be
- found only when it is given a "human-readable name", i.e. a "Topic
Title"
- discovered only when it is interconnected with relevant and related
concepts,
- "horizontally" into the "knowledge network"
- "vertically" into a "taxonomy", where every level of Taxonomy
represents higher and lower degree of "focusing" into "semantic areas",
either in more details and specific, or of wider scope and generic
I experiment with building "knowledge networks" on PBWorks, quite
successfully. However, my anticipation is that TWederation will be even
more suitable for the job. To my understanding, TWederation is aiming same
goals the Distributed Web is trying to achieve:
http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/114061573/IPFS%20is%20the%20Distributed%20Web
Currently, I am looking for the opportunity to shift to this kind of "P2P
Web" environment, as soon as secure and reliable versioning and multi-user
editing realised.
I am curating a student who knows HTML, CSS and JS and selected TiddlyWiki
for his summer project. It would be great if we could develop it into
really successful one, with your help.
I am looking forward to your suggestions and support.
Thank you beforehand,
Dmitry
P.S. Please feel free to browse and explore both Visual Taxonomy and
"knowledge networks" by clicking links and images in the header and body of
the pages.
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 10:16:16 UTC+13, Josiah wrote:
>
> Ciao Birthe C
>
> It IS confusing. But I doubt there will be any change without a clear
> transfer process. As it is absolutely nothing has been settled on yet. So
> don't worry.
>
> These periodic discussions do often, rightly, focus on the limitations of
> here. That does NOT mean this group is suddenly gonna disappear. If
> anything it will continue as is, despite its problems.
>
> Best wishes
> Josiah
>
> On Friday, 23 December 2016 21:32:43 UTC+1, Birthe C wrote:
>>
>> My big question is: Are you planning to end this Google group? I like it
>> for its simplicity. I do undertand that a lot of you here are very familiar
>> with a lot of other possibilities but admit that I am just getting more and
>> more confused.
>>
>> I find a lot of inspiration in reading about other peoples work with
>> tiddlywiki from day to day. In fact I would not be much of a tiddlywiki
>> user without it. I am a reuser with some small twists ;-)
>>
>> Also my biggest problem with searching is my bad english.
>>
>>
>> Birthe
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/aa94764c-f770-4092-b0d4-ac1de6ff2057%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
