I just want to add the footnote that its easy in TW to COMBINE a "personal
markup system" with the standard markup it has. If you composite your own
markup BEFORE the main parser runs then you can have the best of both as
first it would deal with your markup and then standard TW markup. The
downside is you'd need a "Content Type" that likely only your wiki would
have. In many cases this would not matter.
> But I would like to add this nuance, I do often want ways to ensure I
> have a consistent look and feel in a given solution.
> Perhaps this is where people get confused, because they see having YAML
> yet another markup language as providing a consistent look and feel when
> all that is needed is some of our own personal standards.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.