That is interesting ... For Windows usage IF you made a system that kept running after terminal termination it could be a piece of a "user-friendly" approach.
I'm talking here only about thoroughly debugged node (& relatives) based runners of TW. But for that it could bring things closer to seamless integration for ordinary users? Do you ever need to see a console in a self-contained install? Josiah BurningTreeC wrote: > > As I'm a fan of pm2 <http://pm2.keymetrics.io/> - one can use it to start > the single executable and close the terminal afterwards, pm2 keeps it > running > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2f17d4d0-6c0a-413d-8a43-90b6a2602606%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
