S.S,

These are great tidbits! I agree - incorporating Q/A tiddlers into a TW 
would be great - so long as a proper "Scheduler" could help you review them 
in a Spaced Repetition framework

On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 7:37:42 PM UTC-6, S. S. wrote:
>
> Diego,
>
> I am enjoying reading http://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html
> Thanks for sharing. The sentences from the first half of the article that 
> jumped out in direct relation to tw5:
>
> One benefit of using Anki in this way is that you begin to habitually 
>> break things down into atomic questions. This sharply crystallizes the 
>> distinct things you've learned. Personally, I find that crystallization 
>> satisfying, for reasons I (ironically) find difficult to articulate. But 
>> one real benefit is that later* I often find those atomic ideas can be 
>> put together in ways I didn't initially anticipate*. And that's well 
>> worth the trouble. 
>
>
> Anki allows you to organize cards into decks and subdecks. *Some people 
>> use this to create a complicated organizational structure.* I used to do 
>> this, but I've gradually merged my decks and subdecks into one big deck. 
>> *The 
>> world isn't divided up into neatly separated components, *and I believe 
>> it's good to collide very different types of questions.  
>>
>
>
> The Anki site has many shared decks, but I've found only a little use for 
>> them. The most important reason is that making Anki cards is an act of 
>> understanding in itself. *That is, figuring out good questions to ask, 
>> and good answers, is part of what it means to understand a new subject 
>> well.* To use someone else's cards is to forgo much of that 
>> understanding. 
>>
>> Indeed, I believe the act of constructing the cards actually helps with 
>> memory. Memory researchers have repeatedly found that the more elaborately 
>> you encode a memory, the stronger the memory will be. *By elaborative 
>> encoding, they mean essentially the richness of the associations you form.* 
>>
>
> *The act of constructing* an Anki card *is itself nearly always a form of 
>> elaborative encoding.* It *forces you to think through alternate forms 
>> of the question, to consider the best possible answers*, and so on. I 
>> believe this is true for even the most elementary cards. And it certainly 
>> becomes true if you construct more complex cards, cards relating the basic 
>> fact to be remembered to other ideas ( ... ), gradually building up a web 
>> of richly interrelated ideas. 
>>
>  
>
> *Why not use more* of Anki's *features?* Part of the reason is that I get *an 
>> enormous benefit from just the core features.* Furthermore, learning to 
>> use this tiny set of features well has required a lot of work. A basketball 
>> and hoop are simple pieces of equipment, but you can spend a lifetime 
>> learning to use them well. Similarly, basic Anki practice can be developed 
>> enormously. And so *I've concentrated on learning to use those basic 
>> features well.* 
>>
>>
>> I know many people who try Anki out, and then go down a rabbit hole 
>> learning as many features as possible so they can use it “efficiently”. 
>> Usually, they're chasing 1% improvements. Often, those people ultimately 
>> give up Anki as “too difficult”, which is often a synonym for “I got 
>> nervous I wasn't using it perfectly”. This is a pity. 
>>
>>
>> As discussed earlier, Anki offers something like a 20-fold improvement 
>> over (say) ordinary flashcards. And so they're giving up a 2,000% 
>> improvement because they were worried they were missing a few final 5%, 1% 
>> and (in many cases) 0.1% improvements. This kind of rabbit hole seems to be 
>> especially attractive to programmers.
>>
>>
>> For this reason, when someone is getting started I advise not using any 
>> advanced features, and not installing any plugins. Don't, in short, come 
>> down with a bad case of programmer's efficiency disease. Learn how to use 
>> Anki for basic question and answer, and concentrate on exploring new 
>> patterns within that paradigm. That'll serve you far better than any number 
>> of hours spent fiddling around with the features. Then, if you build a 
>> regular habit of high-quality Anki use, you can experiment with more 
>> advanced features.  
>>
>  
>
> Makes me contemplate making "Question/Answer" tiddlers that connect to the 
> information I already have in my TW!
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c7441109-5bc5-4cf8-b6b7-2514fb2c521f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to