Hey Kalmir,

Thanks for your comments - I implemented SM-2 (as best as I can!). Anwiki 
is not yet ready for production though, so I would be careful! It was just 
meant for testing right now. Also, as to your styling point, I think this 
is very important. We can ship it with several built in "card types", when 
we realize that a new "Card-type" is just another template! We can make 
full use of the customizability of TW to let us have very 
sophisticated card types! 

On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 6:33:11 AM UTC-6, Kalmir wrote:
>
> Hi Diego,
>
> I am another keen user of both TW and SRS (mostly Anki). I want to thank 
> you for your effort. I think a TW SRS solution is definitely something 
> desirable.
>
> As for AnWiki – I haven't given it try yet. It is because I thought AnWiki 
> doesn't actually use a sophisticated SRS algorithm. Now I know it does (use 
> SM-2) and I think it is important to underline this fact for people more 
> knowledgable of SRS. But this is not yet stated on anwiki.tiddlyspot.com. 
> This changes things for me and I'll likely use AnWiki for at least some 
> knowledge fields. It doesn't lend itself to more complicated solutions yet, 
> e.g. I use complex language cards in Anki which allow me to quickly add a 
> word in target language, a word in my language, a sentence to test 
> knowledge of the word in context via cloze, notes and audio. But vocabulary 
> is also one domain which probably doesn't need integration with a knowledge 
> base/TW.
>
> As for relationship between information stored internally (brain) and 
> externally (computer - TW). Like many others here, I try to integrate more 
> and more things in TW. And I think it makes great sense to integrate 
> various factoids and understanings, shipped to SRS, hence memory, with TW. 
> Because our memory, understanding and need for understanding is dynamic. I 
> think this might become obvious over the long-term. It could be that 
> several years from now one can remember the information via SRS but 
> actually forget why she decided to store it in memory in the first place or 
> what other related stuff one has worked with before. Simple click (link) in 
> TW could provide the answer. I guess ideally we would all have all our 
> knowledge stored externally in the computer and a selection of that in our 
> brains. If we have part there and part there, that is not desirable. Ok, 
> ideally we would have 
> alll in our heads but that is not possible. Actually that is how some 
> people envision the future role of AI, as augumentation of ourselves, a 
> super-responsive human-like "friend on the phone" who can help us only if 
> he knows all we know (so he doesn't tell us what we don't need to hear) 
> plus what we don't know.
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 7:36:30 PM UTC, Diego Mesa wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As always (and Im sure as alot of you), I am very interested in using TW 
>> for more and more things. Right now, I use *one* TW for *all* of my 
>> tiddlers, and use tags to separate "domains". In other words, if I think I 
>> need another TW, I just make a new tag and voila! it fits in my TW.
>>
>> As some of you might remember, I have also been very interested in using 
>> Spaced Repetition (SR/SRS) to memorize information. Some fantastic 
>> introductions to this are:
>>
>>    - http://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html
>>    - https://www.gwern.net/Spaced-repetition
>>    
>> There are 2-3 major players in the SRS space, but I could never get the 
>> habit to stick with Anki or Memo as I was already working in my TW. As a 
>> result, I tried to create a similar effect in TW which led to Anwiki - a 
>> simple SRS system built into TW:
>>
>> http://anwiki.tiddlyspot.com/ 
>>
>> I am very interested in using TW to store - knowledge I want to be able 
>> to keep, look up, organize and store, *as well as* knowledge I need to 
>> actively memorize. There is a *huge* SRS community out there always 
>> debating what software is better, why, writing plugins for these systems, 
>> etc. I think TW is the best place to keep the things I want to memorize in, 
>> *because 
>> I already keep everything else in there! *If TW is to be a physical 
>> (digital) record of my mind and its development, it only makes sense to 
>> incorporate this into TW! 
>>
>> I think if embraced and further developed, it could bring many more 
>> people into TW, and become "one of the great" TW plugins like TiddlyMap.
>>
>> The purpose of this post is to
>>
>>    1. Inform those of you that don't know about Spaced Repetition
>>    2. Ask the community's opinion about the relationship between 
>>    knowledge you want to keep, and knowledge you want to memorize. 
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0d5306a1-a03a-4cba-b68e-9edce74d7cba%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to