On Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 10:32:23 AM UTC+1, Stephan Hradek wrote: > > Anyhow: To resolve this I propose: > a) Amend the documentation for each (and maybe others) so that people know > that non-existing tiddlers will be dropped >
IMO you could create a PR for this one! > b) Create a new filter "uniq" (named after the UNIX command) which will do > the same as each, except that it will handle non existing tiddlers as well > I'm not really happy with that name: uniq. IMO uniq has a completely different meaning <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniq>. It removes existing duplicates. ... I think tw each operator already does this! For me the each-operator is similar to the js-function forEach. eg: ["a", "b", "c"].forEach() ... So my proposal would be a new operator named: foreach It's similar enough, to be found by users and it's different enough, to ask: What's the difference between "each" and "foreach", to read the docs foreach takes every input given, without the requirement to be an existing tiddler. c) I'm happy to do b) ;) > I'd be happy to test it. just my 2 cents have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7bca299a-9c45-49d6-8cb2-b41e16d86b50%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
