Josiah, I believe you are correct, but someone building a solution now that they can see the end of the tunnel. are possibly already informed by the past, but it is important that people with a "naive disregard [for perceived] fundamental problems" just have a go, and the wise and experienced should look on and help where they can.
Regards Tony On Monday, June 11, 2018 at 9:32:55 PM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Mat: maybe I'm naive and disregard fundamental problems? >> > > I think you are Hot On -- EXCEPT on the question of legacy. On which you > don't seem to see the issue. > > The future will come not just with a shiny new system (I am in favour of) > it will also be because of a BRIDGE to the past. > > My concern is HOW to document the past work (that is huge) so that it can > be included. As IS FOUND now. Not requiring a user to change anything. > > So I see this as about two things ... > > (1) shiny new system > > (2) a data STRUCTURE under which old stuff can be organised. > > I hope this is clear. > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/cba7ab6f-3aa7-4823-8538-d7161a178e86%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
