"Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, no-one has any opinions on this issue one way or the other? If > not, I'm inclined to use the string 'msg' instead of gethostname() and > say that we don't support more than one machine delivering messages to > TMDA at the same time.
I'll venture an opinion, although I haven't had much time recently to think about anything, including this. If including the hostname in the pending filename implies we must also include it in the confirm address, I don't like it. I don't think we gain anything from it and it's just additional complexity. Complexity that doesn't solve an important problem just annoys me. :) Tim _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
