"Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, now that I look at Util.writefile(), I see that it raises > an IOError if the requested destination already exists. So, I don't > think this will be a problem. In the above scenario, the IOError > would defer the message which tried to write second, and next time > the queue is run, it will have a new timestamp and pid, and so no > more clash.
[...] > So, the new pending queue will be a ``Maildir-compatible'' structure > rather than a true Maildir since it doesn't use gethostname() for > the third portion of the filename. BTW, make a mental note of these points to prepare for these inevitable questions/comments once pending is restructured: ``why do the pending filenames end with .msg when my hostname is foobar?'' ``TMDA's pending does not adhere to djb's Maildir spec!'' _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
