David Guerizec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If this is just to avoid displaying the hostname, why not HMAC'ing > it ?
My concern was to avoid lengthening the confirmation address unless necessary. > That would make it closer to DJB's Maildir spec, still confining the > msgid to N chars. See my later messages. I don't think it's necessary to do this because TMDA has other methods of insuring fault tolerance in the event of an initial filename collision. I also don't think strict adherence to the Maildir spec is necessary. pending will still be ``Maildir-compatible'', so it can be manipulated by software that supports Maildir. This is what's important. We're free to choose whatever format we want for pending, as long as it remains reliable, and I think it will. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
