Cory Wright wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:17:38PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: >> I haven't seen clients who don't use either. I'm referring to true >> replies of course, not cases where someone composes a new message >> containing the same Subject---that's not a reply. > > I have noticed that the messages I receive from friends at Exchange > shops have neither 'References' nor 'In-Reply-to' header fields. Here > is an example from a reply I got two days ago: > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 > Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:05:04 -0500 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > Thread-Topic: admin > Thread-Index: AcLyQFkp7x5Kc8nuTYaqqfBbUtcTxQAABfs > > And that is all there is. No need to cater to Exchange though, I'm > just pointing out an example.
Probably off topic, but I don't think MS Outlook (not OE) honors Reply-to headers either. We've had a couple of Outlook shops go crazy with replies to our confirmation requests because it wasn't working.... > > Cory > > -- > Cory Wright > Stand Blue Technology > http://www.standblue.net/ -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
