David Rees wrote: > > Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of Tomcat. I posted a > simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago for the FAQ > included with the Tomcat 3.x and posted a couple messages about it. I > haven't heard a thing about it and saw the release of 3.2.1 come and go > without the documentation fix. > The reason this occurred is that a significant security bug was found, warranting an *immediate* 3.2.1 release that bypassed the usual testing cycle that a beta should go through. This wasn't the only thing that didn't make it -- but security issues are serious and need to be dealt with. Normal processing of bug fixes and patches on the "tomcat_32" tree is now feasible for a 3.2.2 release. Hint: I am not the only committer on this project -- others are welcome to help integrate changes too. > > -Dave Craig
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x cmanolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Aaron Mulder
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x kenneth topp
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Paul Frieden
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Greg Bailey
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_... Marc Saegesser
- [VOTE] Committer Status for ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Committers Pierre Delisle
- Re: Committers Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status ... Hans Bergsten
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status ... Jon Stevens
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status ... cmanolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens