Henri Gomez wrote: > [snip] > > Tomcat 3.x or 4.x? That is the confusion that needs to be cleared up. > > The confusion will exist also for Apache 1.3 / 2.0. And this one will be much > more important. > It's actually pretty clear in the web server case. The active development is happening on 2.0, and nobody's trying to create Apache 1.4. Craig
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Costin Manolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Henri Gomez
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x cmanolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Aaron Mulder
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x kenneth topp
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Paul Frieden
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Greg Bailey
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat ... David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat ... Craig R. McClanahan
- 3.x submitters [was RE: ... Marc Saegesser
- [VOTE] Committer Status ... Craig R. McClanahan