Larry Isaacs wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:15 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan
> >
> >
> > Larry Isaacs wrote:
> >
> > > If so, we may need a way to distinguish between those who are and
> > > aren't committing to maintenance. Both of these +1's should be
> > > counted when comparing against -1's. I wouldn't want to lose
> > > any potential +1's because they didn't want to commit to
> > maintenance.
> > > Whether there are the 3 required committers for maintenance should
> > > be a separate issue.
> > >
>
> > IMHO, having people vote +0 instead of +1 if they like the
> > idea but don't have
> > time to support it is *precisely* what you want. Otherwise,
> > you can get into a
> > scenario of a ton of +1s that say "great idea, as long as
> > someone else does all
> > the work", and where does that leave you?
> >
> > Craig
>
> Oops. I oversimplified my wording. A +1 without committing
> to mainentance would still be a commitment to help with the
> release. Just not a commitment to go beyond the release.
>
OK, i see the distinction you're drawing now.
Hans told us he is going to submit (on GENERAL) his proposed revisions and
clarifications to the voting rules sometime today -- if you care about these
issues, and are not yet subscribed there, I would suggest doing so (send an
empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Larry
>
Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
