I agree with Costin's interpretation of the Jakarta voting rules (even if I don't agree with his "-0" on this particular vote :). Since it is a "majority vote", justifying a "-1" is optional.
<soapbox> I'd like to point out that we have at least 3 non-binding +1 votes on this already. It seems that there is a community out there for a Servlet-only release, and IMHO, we should listen to them. </soapbox> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:32 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution > Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > > > requirement in JSR 154 to provide the Admin Tool, I don't see how your > > argument is valid for what I'm proposing. > > A majority vote doesn't require arguments or validity of arguments. > > "I like the idea" or "I don't like the idea" is all that's needed. > > Valid arguments are required for a veto. > > I don't think it would be good for tomcat community if it will pass with 3 > +1 votes, 2 -1 votes and one -0. > > I hope that more tomcat committers will send at least a +0 or -0, and even > better +1 or -1. There is no need to get into too much debate - just yes > and no would help. > > > > Costin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
