Remy Maucherat wrote: > > I don't see any major issues with 4.1.16, so I plan to tag 4.1.17 (which > hopefully would be the next stable build) tomorrow after a few more > minor tweaks. > > There was a report made against JK 2 immediately after 4.1.16 Beta was > announced. Can someone confirm there's no major issue with JK ?
I made the report and I can confirm that it still isn't working. I'm using exacly the same configuration as for 4.1.12 and 4.1.14 both of which work. There's some fixes we're looking for in the new release so I've been monitoring the list. Should I raise a bug instead of emailing the list? -- Regards, M Martin Sillence PR Newswire DL +44 (0)1865 78 5065 F +44 (0)1865 78 5100 W www.prnewswire.eu.com --------------------------------------- Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of PR Newswire Europe. The e-mail contents are intended only for addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
