Unfortunately for your post about "you can't hear the difference" -

I can - and so can lots of other people.

BTW, there are high res files available for legal download from sites
like HDTracks and Chesky that are in 96k and above. So obtaining hi-res
isn't dependent on ripping from a CD. DVD-A also exists. Some artists,
such as Neil Young, are releasing their music in hi-res formats.

I'm sorry you can't hear the difference. Maybe your stereo isn't good
enough, or your ears aren't. I'm over 50 and the difference is often
striking. It isn't just a matter of high frequencies, but many other
aspects of how music sounds.

If you want to believe the high school physics about why "we can't
hear" anything outside of what a 16/44.1 CD can reproduce, go ahead. But
the truth is that psychoacoustics (what we hear) is way more complicated
than that. Do a little research and you'll find academic and engineering
papers that show otherwise. 

Quote from Robert Hartley at Avguide.com: 

"Bob Stuart (degree in psychoacoustics) has shown in a series of AES
papers why 16-bit/44.1kHz is insufficient to encode all the information
humans can hear. He bases this thesis on models of human hearing that
are generally accepted in the psychoacoustic literature.

Secondly, although 44.1kHz sampling is perfect in theory for encoding a
signal with a bandwidth of 20kHz, in practice 44.1kHz is too slow
because of the requirements it puts on filter design. The anti-aliasing
filter needs to have no attentuation at 20kHz and more than 100dB of
attenuation at 22.05kHz. Such steep filters introduce time-domain
distortions. See the AES papers of the early-to-mid 1990's by Mike
Storey.

Third, there's been a suggestion that although we can't hear sine waves
above 20kHz, we can detect the steepness of transient signals that
implies a bandwidth greater than 20kHz. We use these steep transient in
localizing sounds. Part of the HDCD process (the patent application
makes for fascinating reading) encodes in the hidden information channel
indicators that a signal's transient leading edge is less steep on the
44.1kHz/16-bit signal compared with the high-res original from which the
HDCD-encoded compatible signal is derived. A conjugate process in the
decoder restores the transient's orignal rise time."

If you're happy with standard CD's, that's great. But don't tell the
rest of us what we can and can't hear. And at least admit the
possibility that maybe standard CD's aren't the best medium we have
available, and hi-res adds something we can perceive.


-- 
firedog

Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12 sub; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use
PC with M-Audio 192 as digital source. SB Boom in bedroom. Arcam CD82
which I don't use anymore, even though it's a very good player.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
firedog's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67679

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to