Re: Most standard FM broadcast don't seem to be much better quality then 128 kb/s.
Phil Leigh;461802 Wrote: > Then you need a better broadcaster, tuner or both! Do you have a more reliable quote for measurements about FM radio quality? [Maybe is is 192 kb/s, but it certainly is not CD quality.] A better tuner doesn't help is for a bad source. -- RabanePaco Squeezebox really fulfills my dreams: having all my music at my fingertips (same as on my iPod and on my computers) and lots of good radio stations. Project: Ripping and tagging the second half of my 600 odd CD's. Rip, music manager and tag editing: *'MediaMonkey' (www.mediamonkey.co)*. With iTunes the only good music managers for classical. But MM is by far *the best.* Tag editor: *'Mp3Tag' (www.mp3tag.de/en/)*. The *only good* (and very good) tag editor. Because it is the only one that uses *regular expressions*. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RabanePaco's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21574 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67679 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
