Hi-

1. "You or somebody mentioned the problems with using the steep filters
required to do the necessary filtering above 20Khz. Whiles this is
correct, it ignores that by now almost all players/DACs use
oversampling, which moves the cutoff much higher while allowing filters
with reduced steepness.
If there is obvious differences between the same recording at 44.1 and
96Khz there is a problem somewhere else in the chain, not the recording
resolution itself."

Don't agree about "problem somewhere else in the chain". From the
beginning my sole contention was that hi-res files can sound better than
standard 44k files. Other posters disagree. The "double blind tests
referred to in proving that "people can't hear this or that" often have
obvious flaws when you check how they were conducted, so I don't take
them seriously.

As far as obvious differences between files, what do you call obvious?
I can hear differences when I listen to 96k files. Are they huge - like
the differences between a 64k mp3 and a CD? No. But they can be heard. I
don't know if that makes them "obvious" or not, and I don't care. I care
only that I can hear the difference.

Filters: Read up on pre-ringing and newer players using aphodising
filters - there are only a few very expensive ones on the market. All
reports I've heard give these players high marks for improving the sound
of CD playback. If you read up on pre-ringing, you'll also find out one
of the reasons hi-res playback is superior, at least in theory.

What system? I'm not sure why you're stuck on this and asking me about
a dollar figure for the equipment involved. The point of the discussion
has been about hi-res files, not lossy reproduction. You need a fairly
high end system to reveal the advantages of these files. If a test were
conducted, we would need to agree on the playback system used ahead of
time. A typical home stereo probably isn't good enough to really show
the differences between 16/44 and 24/96.


-- 
firedog

Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12 sub; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use
PC with M-Audio 192 as digital source. SB Boom in bedroom. Arcam CD82
which I don't use anymore, even though it's a very good player.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
firedog's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67679

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to