Raptus;462468 Wrote: 
> Do you at least acknowledge the necessity of a means to filter out bias
> when making comparisons or assessing quality?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So, what is "the best method" in your opinion? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> a) what is a "good hi-resolution sound reproduction" in your opinion?
> b) why do you think you can assume people have never heard "good
> hi-resolution sound reproduction"?
> 
> 

Filter out bias - sure, I'm in favor. But as most of the supposed
"scientific double blind tests" are done, that is all they do. They
don't actually test what people (at least some people) can hear on a
quality setup. Best method - I'm not sure. But again, most of the tests
commonly referred to as "proving" what people can't hear have obvious
problems with the methodology - either in listeners chosen or in
equipment. Beyond that, there is the obvious problem of setting up a
test that actually mirrors how people perceive music. And I'm not at all
sure that quick A/B tests of two files are the way to do it. In fact, I
could make an argument that that's the worst way to do it.

A from above)something with enough quality to reproduce the supposed
differences between the files being tested. Mid-fi systems won't do it.

B from above)I made no comment about "people" in general . I was
referring specifically to one poster, and from his posts it could be
inferred that he'd never actually spent much time listening to hi-res
files, yet "knew" that they couldn't sound better than 16/44.1 to human
ears.


-- 
firedog

Tranquil PC fanless server running SqueezeCenter; SB Duet through
Empirical Audio Pace Car; TACT 2.2XP; MF X-150,Sonus Faber Concerto;
Mirage MS-12 sub; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use
PC with M-Audio 192 as digital source. SB Boom in bedroom. Arcam CD82
which I don't use anymore, even though it's a very good player.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
firedog's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67679

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to