Julf wrote: > Any DAC using reclocking/buffering (often using an asynchronous sample > rate converter) will provide the same degree of jitter immunity, > independent of what interface is used. Asynchronous USB just makes > implementing buffer synchronisation much easier.
If what you're saying is true Julf, that would be an easy solution to my problem. Hoping that's true in the case of this DAC. The way NAD describes this device could lead you to think otherwise though: "The D 1050s digital inputs allow you to connect many different digital sources. SPDIF inputs support both coaxial and optical connectors. The USB input is very specialits asynchronous operation mode uses the D 1050s high precision clock to control the output of the connected USB device for lowest possible jitter. It also supports USB Audio Codec 2.0 allowing 192kHz signal transmission via USB." Not sure if their wording and your explanation are contradictory or not. I have played 192 files through the digital coax input without any trouble. USB and optical as well, had buffering issues. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tdgruen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62816 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94512
_______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
