Hello Again, > > > > Do you have a suggested play order or rules for playing. Otherwise I'll > > add them with rules something like: > > 1. tracks = [list of tracks in a particular directory] > > 2. Pick a track > > 3. Play it > > 4. Pick another track, make sure it isn't the same one > > 5. Goto step 3. > > sounds fine to me ... if there are only 3 songs it's OK to have a > program like this. If there will be more songs I recommend to make > something database like, so you can write down in a file how often a > song was played and then maybe play it more often.
If people want to go that far, I'd suggest they point their usual music player at the data dir, and disable music in the main client. > > Feel free to add more tracks and more endings ;-) > > Please don't expect too much new stuff in the near future. If you have > some special wishes just tell me about them, so we can talk about them > and I maybe could realize them faster. A (short) fast tempo one would be nice to play near the end of a turn. Additionally a hopeful mood one might be nice, something for the beginning of the game, when people are taking there first steps into this wonderous new universe of plunder, er I mean universe of promis. Otherwise: - Battle music is cool - Bustling music mid game when trading and resources are travelling all over the place, but we haven't hit the end game destruction yet. I can think of more if you like. > > I'll probably play with it, and see how it goes. I'll also see how they > > cross-fade. > That's probably the best thing to do! thanks for trying it out! Be a week before I get TP coding time again however. Watch this space. > > Galaxie is my thousand parsec client using the EFL. It is currently > > licenced under GPL. > I really have to try it out, even though I am not sure what EFL is. www.enlightenment.org > > Oggs would be preferable. Saves the whole "to play this music you must > > violate a patent" issue. > > as much as I know all patents are about encoding mp3s, not decoding them > (I could be wrong of course). But I still like oggs more (even though I > am not using them) because they are better in quality/size and free. Not quite that simple. Personal decoding is not chased down, propietry playback can be. > I know that... that's why I asked. I think I can license them without > NC, but I want to talk about it in the chat first. It's entirely your call. > > Of course the flip site is also possible: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/24/creative_commons_deception/ > I know that case... and it really annoyed me. IMO it has nothing to do > with CC because even if it was a professional photographer and he would > have the right to use that picture he couldn't sell it for a marketing > campaign. To me that is a issue between the marketing company and the > parents. Indeed. The CC angle was important as a lot of people put things in CC without really realising what it means. > about that other email: I also think that there is a problem if people > could change your license just like that, but I don't think that > anything bad will happen in that case and I don't really have much > choice if I want to use CC. You can always take the licence, and remove that clause ;-) > btw: do you accept licenses that are not approved by lawyers? ;) > I have a very good one... Not directly, but I can get advice on licences easily enough. Regards, nash _______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
