It would seem that we've gone into a RTC, reversed technological cycle here...... maybe this is what America needs!?
>What is the proposed "Return Loss" requirement? How would one "Impedance Match" the string to can termination? Somehow the termination would need to be matched to the density of the string.... > >What a novel idea...who came up with this technology anyway? We could call it VSL - Voiceband String Line. Maybe someone will develope a TFSL - Taught Fishing String Line technology for more bandwidth... > >- MPP - > >---------- >From: Victor L. Boersma[SMTP:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, June 13, 1997 6:59 AM >To: INTERNET:[email protected] >Subject: Re: Cans & String Standard > >An intenational committee is being formed as we speak to formalize the >definitive >standard for two cans and a piece of string. Meetings will be held at select >places >around the globe that charge less than $ 50.00 per night. > >Consesus will be reached by means of endurance marches, preferably barefoot in >the sand along a beach. > > >Please do not use this channel to reply and/or apply for membership. > > >Ciao Bene, > > >Victor L. F. Boersma >[email protected] > > > >Attachment Converted: C:\Eudora\Attach\RE Cans & String Standard > Decodog Webmaster "Cabledogs on the Net" http://www.cyberhighway.net/~wiredog/cabledogs.html
