I do take exception to any humor on the RCIC forum for this exact reason, Ricky. Who decides, what is proper, relevant, and funny, you?
I had absolutely not one thing to do with the joke the New One and your intimation that it was me is the height of intellectual collapse. It is beyond my capacity to understand the volume of stupidity leading you to make the presupposition that I sent that vulgar joke just because I object to this forum being corrupted. I suppose that is how you think and act hence the way you think others act and think. In fact I do know who sent the thing, he is a really good guy who just made a mistake, which he is very embarrassed by, and tried to remedy, albeit unsuccessfully. In fact many folks in this area know who it was. And it ain't me, Ricky. So I if you are any man at all you will call me to offer your humble apology. But alas, you Ricky, are the type that has to hide behind the internet to make false and damaging accusations so there are no repercussions to you. Paul Edward Wooley 972-481-6630 > -----Original Message----- > From: Towner, Richard C. [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 1998 8:00 PM > To: Rae Dulmage > Subject: Re: New One > > The "New One" joke was infantile, tasteless, offensive, and above all, > > misplaced. Even the sender knows that. > > But there is a significant difference between well-conceived humor > such as > Andy Griffin's recent spoof of "foreward" -- which was delivered with > a > twinkle in his eye -- > and the "New One" joke (if you can call it that) -- which was > delivered with > an adolescent and lascivious grin. > > Now I ask you, ye who consider this an improper forum for humor, to > consider > an analogy: > Wearing a tie to work is something many consider proper and > professional. > But how many people do you know who ALWAYS wear a tie to work, yet > never, > NEVER unbutton their shirt at the collar underneath that tie? > The only person I knew was my Grandfather -- who died an untimely > death -- > and he wore clip-ons. May they both rest in peace! > And so may this issue! > > Rick > ---------- > |From: Rae Dulmage > |To: RCTOWNER; treg > |Subject: Re: New One > |Date: Thursday, January 22, 1998 6:07PM > | > |Paul Wooley, > | > |I agree, > | > |G. Rae Dulmage > | > |---------- > |> From: Paul Wooley <[email protected]> > |> To: '[email protected]' > |> Subject: RE: New One > |> Date: January 22, 1998 16:44 PM > |> > |> I'll restate my original position that this is not the proper forum > for > |> this sort of thing. > |> > |> > -----Original Message----- > |> > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]] > |> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 1998 2:28 PM > |> > To: INTERNET:[email protected]; [email protected] > |> > Subject: Re: New One > |> > > |> > Thank you, Vic. > |> > > |> > Tania Grant > |> > [email protected] > |> > > |> > > |> > ______________________________ Reply Separator > |> > _________________________________ > |> > Subject: New One > |> > Author: [email protected] at P_Internet_Mail > |> > Date: 1/22/98 10:36 AM > |> > > |> > > |> > > The woman had gotten into the habit of exercising along with > one of > |> > those > |> > > |> > This isn't funny any longer. Vic << File: cc:Mail note part >> > |
