I'm curious about what you mean by the BB's "stability". We have these devices hang up on a regular basis, and synchronization is a constant issue. They are definitely not as stable as my Tungsten T3. I speak not from using just one, but from supporting several hundred of them.
Mike Lax From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandro Campos Mancini Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 7:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times? That is indeed true. BlackBerryOS and software offerings might be slightly lame compared to what is (was) offered for Treos (their E-mail client is SO weak even the iPhone's client circles around it, not to mention PalmOS and WinMo offerings), but DAMN they're stable! Should my Treo 680 fail I'd be sincerely divided between WinMo's power and features and BB's stability and 'relative' ease of use. --- Sandro Campos Mancini -----Original Message----- From: "Roger Prokic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:roger%40prokic.org> > Date: Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 12:51 am Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times? To: "Treo User Palm Treo User Group" <[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> >Reply-To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> Buy a Blackberry and you will be happy once again with a device as solid as the original palm. Roger -=[ Sent via BlackBerry Curve 8310 by AT&T ]=- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
