No problem Karen, only too pleased too Regards
Jomo -----Original Message----- From: K.Huntington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 June 2008 22:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times? Hey Jomo, If you're serious about being moderated and aren't already could I ask you to consider sending this through for me. I can't, for the reasons below, and will understand if you choose not too. I realize that I may get banned for it but there are worse things and this list is of limited benefit to me anyway, the way things stand. Thanks, Karen "I think the moderators of this list have been biased and power-tripping and quite possibly sexist for a long time. "They" will moderate people WITH NO WARNING for simply posting an opinion they don't share. I speak from experience as I have been moderated for over a year now (excessive and unnecessary) for speaking up on an OT thread I didn't even start, yet Roger is still going on, and on. Now, when I try to ask questions about my 680 my messages don't often make it to the list and when they do they are often days late and usually no longer relevant. It makes me wonder how much is actually being contributed by the members of this list that we never get to see." Jomo wrote: Can you moderate me too co's obviously the truth hurts Regards Jomo -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Craig Froehle Sent: 07 June 2008 17:49 To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times? Roger has been moderated for excessive proselytizing even after repeated pleas not to do so. - mod
