Ah yes, apples and oranges and pears!  I pretty much had the various
"unlimited" plans figured out before.  I'll have to go look again, since the
competitive forces keep shifting the playing field!

 

Message:   one must be careful to ask "unlimited what?" and then find out
much the other stuff costs!

 

Speaking of which, and in line with the subject of this thread, anybody know
how much extra tethering will cost on the Verizon Pre?

 

Cheers,

Don

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Michael M. Rye
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 4:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Pre vs Android

 

  

>From my understanding, Verizon's $70/month plan is for voice only.
Data is extra. So it'll still cost more than Sprint's $70/month plan.

-- 
Michael

On 1/19/2010 12:52 AM, Don Ferguson wrote:
> I've written quite a bit about bits and pieces of your questions here,
but,
> generally speaking, in the 11,000 square mile area in which I make most of
> my calls (60 miles +/- around Denver) Sprint's coverage is at least as
good
> as, and usually better than Verizon. Verizon is better than AT&T and
> T-Mobile. Sprint, until recent announcements, has been the cheapest of the
> four. With T-Mobile lowering unlimited prices to around $50/month, and
> Verizon lowering theirs to $70/month, they might be competitive on price
> with Sprint, whose unlimited Everything plan costs me $100/month, but I'll
> be looking for a corresponding reduction!
>
>
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Don
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
John
> Messeder
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 10:46 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Pre vs Android
>
> . . . snip . . .
>
> Still -- how's service with Sprint?
>
> . . . snip . . .
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to