true - but you still see car manufacturers restricting in-dash video systems while the car is in motion because of legal (or potential legal) reasons.
On 2/14/10, John Messeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Depending on the state, at least one party must consent. In Pa. it takes > both parties' consent. > All which goes out the window if you're the federal Justice Dept. > News item Friday said DoJ has appealed a lower court decision that > refused to allow Justice access to personal phone records without a warrant. > But for those of us who take the Constitution seriously, you are > exactly correct. Still, making the capability available does not give > Palm responsibility for a user's illegal actions. Anyway, all the Treos > had the capability to record notes, and I think in the PalmOS days there > was an app that allowed recording phone conversations. > > On 2/14/2010 9:38 PM, ldouglas wrote: >> isn't there a legal reason behind recording phone conversations >
