*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Ok. I don't get it. If your placing a Y to mean any postulate, why not say any 
postulate instead of Y? 

How do you know what is the function? One minus Y. What I see is one of 
anything minus one of any Y(postulate) equals nothing. Wrong?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:55 PM, Pete Mclaughlin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> Hi Cory
> The brackets are like a picture frame. They tell you to resolve the function 
> within the brackets before considering how it relates to terms outside the 
> brackets.
> 
> (1-Y)X means everything that is not Y is opposed by X where 1-YX means the 
> universe minus the postulate pair YX.
> 
> Unfortunately the English language is not precise enough replace the 
> algebraic formula.
> 
> Sincerely
> Pete
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> *************
>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>> ************
>> So x represents any postulate. What about the brackets? Is it possible to 
>> write that formula into words rather than algebraic symbols?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pete Mclaughlin 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> *************
>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>> ************
>>> Hi Cory
>>> The algebraic terms are defined by Dennis in the supplemental lectures. 
>>> 
>>> You do not need to solve the equations just define the terms as though they 
>>> were words so you can read a sentence containing a term like X(1-X) and 
>>> instantly get that the author is saying that any postulate and it's absence 
>>> add up to the whole universe. 
>>> 
>>> If X is cats then all cats plus everything that is not a cat equals all the 
>>> mass energy space and time in the universe we are in.
>>> 
>>> The only way to get this level of familiarity with TROM is to reread the 
>>> materials multiple times.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely
>>> Pete
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> *************
>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>> ************
>>>> Cool. Care to share an understanding of this algebra? I never learned it 
>>>> in school, just basic math... 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Pete Mclaughlin 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> *************
>>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>>> ************
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is a clip from Ken Ogger's book Super Scio on how to study.  It 
>>>>> seems Dennis' worry that people would just sit around and talk about TROM 
>>>>> is just the normal activity of studying a subject.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "WHAT IS: Current Scientology study technology tends to specialize in 
>>>>> handling MUs and doing demonstrations of things in clay. These are useful 
>>>>> techniques. Sometimes its enough, especially for adults who already have 
>>>>> a great deal of knowledge and are doing a course with a great deal of 
>>>>> enthusiasm.
>>>>> WHAT ISN’T: This is totally inadequate for use in schools. The 1950s view 
>>>>> was much broader and actually highlights how bad the current approach is. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The basic Scientology idea on the whole topic is that understanding comes 
>>>>> from affinity, reality, and communication (ARC). They still know this, 
>>>>> but they have forgotten how to apply it. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> First and foremost, you need to get the students to like a subject. An 
>>>>> interested student will learn the subject despite a bad teacher. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> You need to promote free and open communication about the subject, 
>>>>> especially between the students (currently discouraged in the CofS). 
>>>>> 
>>>>> You need to see and examine things and try things out to build reality. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> You need to look through the materials multiple times rather than just 
>>>>> working forward through a checksheet robotically. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> As a substitute for experience, you need to sit and imagine what you're 
>>>>> going to do and how you're going to handle anything that could go wrong. 
>>>>> And you need to decide that you invented the subject to make it your own 
>>>>> and get it fully into your own universe (yes Ron actually tells students 
>>>>> to do this on a 1954 tape)."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think the most important point is to read through the materials many 
>>>>> times till you can picture how all the bits and pieces work together. 
>>>>> When you can read the algebraic formulas in TROM and get what they mean 
>>>>> instead of just mouthing the names of the symbols you will be close to 
>>>>> understanding.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The formula XY+X(1-Y)+Y(1-X)+(1-X)(1-Y)=1 means regarding these two 
>>>>> postulates X and Y we are going to look at every being and animal and 
>>>>> planet and star in the multiple universes to find any time we had a 
>>>>> complementary or conflicting alignment between these two postulates or 
>>>>> their absences.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you read that formula and get that understanding then you are doing 
>>>>> well on studying TROM.  If not you need to keep rereading the material 
>>>>> and defining terms till the understanding comes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Keep on TROMing
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pete 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Trom mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Trom mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Trom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to