************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Cory You need to read the books 01 Insanity Point 02 The Philosophy of TROM 03 Expanding on Level 5 04 Bond Breaking 05 The Game Strategy
These are the supplemental lectures where Dennis goes into great detail defining the algebra of TROM and giving examples. There is a lot to learn so you will need to read them through several times. Go to www.tromhelp.com/books to the Createspace box at the bottom of the page and download the books that Colleen and I have been error checking. They are the easiest to read copies of the supplemental lectures. Sincerely Pete Sent from my iPad > On Mar 2, 2014, at 10:10 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Ok. I don't get it. If your placing a Y to mean any postulate, why not say > any postulate instead of Y? > > How do you know what is the function? One minus Y. What I see is one of > anything minus one of any Y(postulate) equals nothing. Wrong? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:55 PM, Pete Mclaughlin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ************* >> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >> ************ >> Hi Cory >> The brackets are like a picture frame. They tell you to resolve the function >> within the brackets before considering how it relates to terms outside the >> brackets. >> >> (1-Y)X means everything that is not Y is opposed by X where 1-YX means the >> universe minus the postulate pair YX. >> >> Unfortunately the English language is not precise enough replace the >> algebraic formula. >> >> Sincerely >> Pete >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ************* >>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>> ************ >>> So x represents any postulate. What about the brackets? Is it possible to >>> write that formula into words rather than algebraic symbols? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pete Mclaughlin >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> ************* >>>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>>> ************ >>>> Hi Cory >>>> The algebraic terms are defined by Dennis in the supplemental lectures. >>>> >>>> You do not need to solve the equations just define the terms as though >>>> they were words so you can read a sentence containing a term like X(1-X) >>>> and instantly get that the author is saying that any postulate and it's >>>> absence add up to the whole universe. >>>> >>>> If X is cats then all cats plus everything that is not a cat equals all >>>> the mass energy space and time in the universe we are in. >>>> >>>> The only way to get this level of familiarity with TROM is to reread the >>>> materials multiple times. >>>> >>>> Sincerely >>>> Pete >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ************* >>>>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>>>> ************ >>>>> Cool. Care to share an understanding of this algebra? I never learned it >>>>> in school, just basic math... >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Pete Mclaughlin >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ************* >>>>>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>>>>> ************ >>>>>> Hi all >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is a clip from Ken Ogger's book Super Scio on how to study. It >>>>>> seems Dennis' worry that people would just sit around and talk about >>>>>> TROM is just the normal activity of studying a subject. >>>>>> >>>>>> "WHAT IS: Current Scientology study technology tends to specialize in >>>>>> handling MUs and doing demonstrations of things in clay. These are >>>>>> useful techniques. Sometimes its enough, especially for adults who >>>>>> already have a great deal of knowledge and are doing a course with a >>>>>> great deal of enthusiasm. >>>>>> WHAT ISN’T: This is totally inadequate for use in schools. The 1950s >>>>>> view was much broader and actually highlights how bad the current >>>>>> approach is. >>>>>> >>>>>> The basic Scientology idea on the whole topic is that understanding >>>>>> comes from affinity, reality, and communication (ARC). They still know >>>>>> this, but they have forgotten how to apply it. >>>>>> >>>>>> First and foremost, you need to get the students to like a subject. An >>>>>> interested student will learn the subject despite a bad teacher. >>>>>> >>>>>> You need to promote free and open communication about the subject, >>>>>> especially between the students (currently discouraged in the CofS). >>>>>> >>>>>> You need to see and examine things and try things out to build reality. >>>>>> >>>>>> You need to look through the materials multiple times rather than just >>>>>> working forward through a checksheet robotically. >>>>>> >>>>>> As a substitute for experience, you need to sit and imagine what you're >>>>>> going to do and how you're going to handle anything that could go wrong. >>>>>> And you need to decide that you invented the subject to make it your own >>>>>> and get it fully into your own universe (yes Ron actually tells students >>>>>> to do this on a 1954 tape)." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the most important point is to read through the materials many >>>>>> times till you can picture how all the bits and pieces work together. >>>>>> When you can read the algebraic formulas in TROM and get what they mean >>>>>> instead of just mouthing the names of the symbols you will be close to >>>>>> understanding. >>>>>> >>>>>> The formula XY+X(1-Y)+Y(1-X)+(1-X)(1-Y)=1 means regarding these two >>>>>> postulates X and Y we are going to look at every being and animal and >>>>>> planet and star in the multiple universes to find any time we had a >>>>>> complementary or conflicting alignment between these two postulates or >>>>>> their absences. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you read that formula and get that understanding then you are doing >>>>>> well on studying TROM. If not you need to keep rereading the material >>>>>> and defining terms till the understanding comes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Keep on TROMing >>>>>> >>>>>> Pete >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Trom mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Trom mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Trom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Trom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
