*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi Pete
Algebraically: (1-Y)X translates to X-YX and not 1-YX, which would mean
X minus the postulate pair YX. Does this still work?
Regards
Dave Langley
On 03/03/2014 06:55, Pete Mclaughlin wrote:
Hi Cory
The brackets are like a picture frame. They tell you to resolve the
function within the brackets before considering how it relates to
terms outside the brackets.
(1-Y)X means everything that is not Y is opposed by X where 1-YX means
the universe minus the postulate pair YX.
Unfortunately the English language is not precise enough replace the
algebraic formula.
Sincerely
Pete
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
************
So x represents any postulate. What about the brackets? Is it
possible to write that formula into words rather than algebraic symbols?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pete Mclaughlin
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
************
Hi Cory
The algebraic terms are defined by Dennis in the supplemental lectures.
You do not need to solve the equations just define the terms as
though they were words so you can read a sentence containing a term
like X(1-X) and instantly get that the author is saying that any
postulate and it's absence add up to the whole universe.
If X is cats then all cats plus everything that is not a cat equals
all the mass energy space and time in the universe we are in.
The only way to get this level of familiarity with TROM is to reread
the materials multiple times.
Sincerely
Pete
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Cory Keeler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
************
Cool. Care to share an understanding of this algebra? I never
learned it in school, just basic math...
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Pete Mclaughlin
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
************
Hi all
Here is a clip from Ken Ogger's book Super Scio on how to study.
It seems Dennis' worry that people would just sit around and talk
about TROM is just the normal activity of studying a subject.
"WHAT IS: Current Scientology study technology tends to specialize
in handling MUs and doing demonstrations of things in clay. These
are useful techniques. Sometimes its enough, especially for adults
who already have a great deal of knowledge and are doing a course
with a great deal of enthusiasm.
WHAT ISN'T: This is totally inadequate for use in schools. The
1950s view was much broader and actually highlights how bad the
current approach is.
The basic Scientology idea on the whole topic is that
understanding comes from affinity, reality, and communication
(ARC). They still know this, but they have forgotten how to apply it.
First and foremost, you need to get the students to like a
subject. An interested student will learn the subject despite a
bad teacher.
You need to promote free and open communication about the subject,
especially between the students (currently discouraged in the CofS).
You need to see and examine things and try things out to build
reality.
You need to look through the materials multiple times rather than
just working forward through a checksheet robotically.
As a substitute for experience, you need to sit and imagine what
you're going to do and how you're going to handle anything that
could go wrong. And you need to decide that you invented the
subject to make it your own and get it fully into your own
universe (yes Ron actually tells students to do this on a 1954 tape)."
I think the most important point is to read through the materials
many times till you can picture how all the bits and pieces work
together. When you can read the algebraic formulas in TROM and get
what they mean instead of just mouthing the names of the symbols
you will be close to understanding.
The formula XY+X(1-Y)+Y(1-X)+(1-X)(1-Y)=1 means regarding these
two postulates X and Y we are going to look at every being and
animal and planet and star in the multiple universes to find any
time we had a complementary or conflicting alignment between these
two postulates or their absences.
If you read that formula and get that understanding then you are
doing well on studying TROM. If not you need to keep rereading
the material and defining terms till the understanding comes.
Keep on TROMing
Pete
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
