Re: [TruthTalk] The Sabbath Breaker of Numbers

[Slade Henson]

Dave Miller Said: Luther was being quoted as an authority, and I was giving reason why he is not a very good authority on this particular subject (from my perspective).   Slade Says: You are right, Dave. He (Luther) is not a very good authority. In fact, some of his teachings are as heretical as they come. I.E.: He demanded the removal of James from the New Testament. He demanded the removal of the book of Revelation from the canon. He kept the Catholic's First Day of the Week worship. (Unfortunately, most ardent SUNday worshippers do not realize they are nothing more than REALLY GOOD OBEDIENT CATHOLICS.) He is the one who demanded the inclusion of "ONLY" in Romans 3:28 He kept the "Lord's Supper" dogma from the Mithra Sun Worship service in Protestantism/Lutheranism. -- slade   Do not hit the REPLY button when responding to this email. Please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly. My hotmail account is used exclusively for out-going email. Thank you. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 23 March, 2003 08:52 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Sabbath Breaker of Numbers > David Miller wrote: > I have not attacked the messenger.  Luther was being quoted as an > authority, and I was giving reason why he is not a very good authority > on this particular subject (from my perspective).  A lot of people have > respect for Martin Luther because of the tremendous role he played in > the Reformation.  However, most people just know him as a famous > historical name and are not really all that knowledgeable about him. > Did you know the facts that I shared about Martin Luther?  If you did > know all those facts, don't assume everyone on TruthTalk does.  Perhaps > I should take a poll and ask if there is anyone on TruthTalk who did not > know all the facts that I shared about Martin Luther and his sacred cow > "sola fide."  How many people on TruthTalk knew that Luther rejected the > book of James as not part of the Bible, urged people to burn it because > it contradicted his "sola fide" doctrine, and that he added words to > Paul's writings in order to further his "sola fide" doctrine?