FYI, that's just another mormon “computer trouble” trick they play when the heat gets too uncomfortable around here! :-) (Next DaveH will say his computer is on the fritz!!! DaveH, where are your friend when you really need them?) Izzy

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blaine R Borrowman
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism

 

Hey people, I am way behind in answering e-mail--I have about 130 posts

yet to read, most of them from TT.  I am going to have my computer worked

on, which may involve reprogramming the hard drive, unless the problem

turns out to be the modem--the basic problem is, I can send and receive

e-mail, but Juno can't find the modem when I try to get on the Internet.

 So, if I don't reply to some of your posts, it may yet be caused by the

hard drive getting dumped, and starting from scratch.  Meanwhile, I am

going to go off TT temporarily, to keep the number of posts from clogging

my Juno.

 

See ya all later.

 

BlaineRB

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:53:11 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

writes:

> Kevin wrote:

> > 1 Co 15:29 Else what shall they do which are baptized

> > for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they

> > then baptized for the dead?

> > Here Paul abruptly switches gear and refers to a group

> > outside of the Christians he had been refering to throughout

> > the whole chapter. He now uses the THIRD person pronoun "they",

> > since he is refering to PAGANs and Heathens.

>

> Excellent point.  The Mormons always seem to ignore this point.  I

> have

> not seen an answer to it.  Blaine and Dave, can you give some kind

> of

> answer to the language used here?  Why does he talk "we" up to this

> verse, then switch to "they" if he did not consider those who

> baptized

> for the dead to be in some other group?

>

> Kevin wrote:

> > If Baptism is essential to the Gospel & Salvation, then

> > why does Paul say? 1 Corinthians 1:17 For Christ sent me

> > not to baptize, but to preach the gospel They are 2 separate

> > things, on the one hand Baptism (NOT sent), the other Gospel

> > (sent).  If baptism was an essential part of the Gospel, then

> > he would have been "sent" to perform such. Instead he was sent

> > to Preach the Gospel.

>

> I do not believe that baptism is essential to salvation, but I do

> believe that baptism plays a role in salvation for those who use it

> in

> the faith filled way that it was meant to be used.  I believe that

> baptism is part of the gospel.  Remember how the Eunuch asked Philip

> to

> baptize him after hearing the gospel?  Why would he ask that if

> baptism

> was not part of the gospel?  Why did the apostles always usher new

> converts into the waters of baptism if it was not part of what they

> preached?  Furthermore, the "Great Commission" distinctly mentions

> baptism as part of the work, so we know that the twelve were sent

> to

> baptize even though Paul was not.

>

> "And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto

> me

> in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,

> BAPTIZING THEM in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of

> the

> Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have

> commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of

> the

> world. Amen." (Matthew 28:18-20 KJV)

>

> The reason that Paul was not sent to baptize was because Jesus sent

> his

> ministers out as teams.  The labor among them was divided.  For

> example,

> Paul and Barnabas made one such team.  Paul preached; Barnabas

> baptized.

> We can find a clear mention in Scripture that Paul was the

> principal

> speaker, but we don't really read much about what Barnabas did. What

> was

> he, some spectator?  I think not.  It seems safe to assume that

> Barnabas

> played a role in baptizing considering Paul's statement that he did

> not

> baptize much.  We know the Corinthians were baptized.  Who would

> argue

> that the Corinthians did not receive baptism?  Furthermore, we know

> that

> Paul baptized some of them, especially the important ones, such as

> when

> Crispus, the chief of the synagogue, believed on Christ. The

> logical

> conclusion here is that Paul preached and others with him baptized

> those

> who responded to the gospel.

>

> Peace be with you.

> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

>

>

> ----------

> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you

> may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)

> http://www.InnGlory.org

>

> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you

> have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

>

>

----------

"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

 

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

 

Reply via email to