Since it is a clear as the NOONDAY Sun that the prophets ended with the announcement of THE Prophet, who never passed away to need replacing, Jesus Christ.
Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John
In times past - the Prophets; Now he speaks by the Son
Hebrews 1:1-2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things
The Law & the Prophets wrote of Jesus John 1:45 Now that He has been here, He is the fulfillment of both Mt 5:17
Why do we need A prophet, when we have THE prophet?
Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: DaveSent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:24 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] revelationTerry Clifton wrote:
How 'bout a simple definition? Receiving revelation is the act of learning something not previously revealed to the recipient. God can reveal through a prophet, or an ass, or by direct communication.
DAVEH: Then it could be assumed that one need not be a prophet to receive revelation. However, would you agree that a prophet would by his nature receive revelations from the Lord? And.....such revelations would be extra Bilbical, if they were revealed to a modern day prophet. May I assume most TTers would agree with this?A prophet carries a message from God to men. It may be a warning, a curse, a verdict, almost anything. We ran out of prophets in the stricktest sense of the word a looong time ago. Staying with the strictest sense of the word, it has been even longer since an ass spoke for God. It is my opinion that the Holy Spirit now has a monopoly on revelation outside of the Holy Bible.
Terry
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
