Do you want to know why Prophets do not exist?
Luke 16:16 THE PROPHETS WERE UNTIL JOHN
Hebrews 1:1 Prophets are passed away NOW God speaks through His son
What is so hard to understand about this. It is the Plain teaching of scripture.
You say Paul is a prophet,
I say Paul was an Apostle not a prophet. Acts 14:14
Paul says he is a APOSTLE
Romans 1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God
1 Co 1:1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God
Paul an APOSTLE Gal 1:1, Eph 1:1, Col 1:1, 1Tim 1:1, 2 Tim 1:1, Titus 1:1
Plain teaching of Paul & Scripture, what is so hard?
Paul said Rom 15:19 I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.
There is not more to reveal.
When you get right what God has already revealed maybe He will reveal more to you.
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Since it is a clear as the NOONDAY Sun that the prophets ended with the announcement of THE Prophet,
DAVEH: It is not clear to me at all. The Bible even predicts there would be prophets in the last days. And after being on TT, I thought modern day prophets were accepted in Protestantism.
who never passed away to need replacing, Jesus Christ.Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until JohnDAVEH: Now I am beginning to see why some Protestants say the law is no longer valid (or perhaps it would be better to say....in effect).In times past - the Prophets; Now he speaks by the Son
DAVEH: Through prophets, just as was Paul when he wrote this. I assume you accept Paul as a prophet, Kevin? Correct me if I am wrong.
Hebrews 1:1-2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all thingsDAVEH: I will be curious to hear if you think Paul was a prophet.The Law & the Prophets wrote of Jesus John 1:45 Now that He has been here, He is the fulfillment of both Mt 5:17
DAVEH: ??? I don't quite see how you think Jesus' fulfillment of the law and prophets mean that neither now exist, Kevin.
Why do we need A prophet, when we have THE prophet?DAVEH: Couldn't a prophet reveal more of the Lord's secrets? Or......do you think the Lord revealed everything he wants us to know in the Bible?
Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Terry Clifton wrote:How 'bout a simple definition? Receiving revelation is the act of learning something not previously revealed to the recipient. God can reveal through a prophet, or an ass, or by direct communication.
DAVEH: Then it could be assumed that one need not be a prophet to receive revelation. However, would you agree that a prophet would by his nature receive revelations from the Lord? And.....such revelations would be extra Bilbical, if they were revealed to a modern day prophet. May I assume most TTers would agree with this?A prophet carries a message from God to men. It may be a warning, a curse, a verdict, almost anything. We ran out of prophets in the stricktest sense of the word a looong time ago. Staying with the strictest sense of the word, it has been even longer since an ass spoke for God. It is my opinion that the Holy Spirit now has a monopoly on revelation outside of the Holy Bible.
Terry
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
