Attached pic
Forger/Bomber Mark Hoffman with First Presidency. Supposed Prophet, Seer, and Revelator Spencer W. Kimball inspects document with a magnifying glass, yet is unable to detect it is a fraud.
The church bought these FORGED instruments to COVER up.
The whole first presidency was involved.
Unfortunately 2 LDS got killed in the incident.
The Prophet was complicit in Mark Hoffmans murderous cover up scheme
Why couldn't the prophet see the FALSENESS with his Magnifying glass?
Maybe he should have used th URIM & THUMMIM
Why didn't the Prophet-Seer use some seer stones?
How about sticking his head in a hat, then he would not have been FOOLED
How many millions in TITHE money did the church pay out & loose to Hoffman?
Documents not for public consumption are HIDDEN in the Church vault in Little Cottonwood canyon
SEER can't see!
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08071.html
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blaine,
Orwellian is exactly what it is. It is changing the truth into a lie to
control the opinioins of others. If this is what our government is involved
in, then I am against it as well. However, I am not against the US
government maintining secrets, the release of which would endanger the lives
of our servicemen or citizens, or the security of our nation.
Perry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Blaine: Orwellian!! LOL You have a sinister mind to ascribe Orwellian
>motives to the LDS Church in general, but more so with regards to Brigham
>Young University, Perry. We are talking about a school practice here,
>aren't we? Not a churchwide practice. Nothing sinister here!! Just
>common sense that if you photograph and publish the photo of a very popular
> athlete wearing obvious violations of the school standards on his arm,
>you are publicly endorsing the violation. Of course that makes sense to
>me, but maybe not to someone like yourself who seems to see sinister plots
>and/or conspiritorial motives in everything the Mormon Church does.
>Maybe, as I have suggested before, you need to find someone whith a couch
>in his office, and tell him all about this problem you have. LOL
>BTW, Perry, what do you think of the US government when it covers up
>sensitive information, or classifies information as "secret"? Is that
>Orwellian, or just common sense operating?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 9:08 PM
>Subject: [TruthTalk] LDS: Historical revisionists and censorers.
>
>
> > >From: "Blaine Borrowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Blaine: Mr. Tittle offers a perfectly good reason for covering up
>the >tatoos and etc. He says, "it's easier to doctor photos than deal with
> > >irate callers demanding to know why athletes are being immodest or
>wearing > >tattoos that many Latter-day Saints deem offensive or a violation of >church > > >standards."
> >
> > Blaine,
> >
> > I am appalled that you would support such an action. This is very
> > Orwellian. And you think this practice is acceptable?
> >
> > Don't you think that if the "church owned school" officials are
>willing to alter photos of athletes to avoid irate callers, the church is also
> > willing to alter or hide negative church records to avoid irate members?
> > (In fact, we know they do this.) Doesn't that make you wonder what the
> > church may be hiding or altering that might concern it's own members,
>and > > that might invalidate the church or cast doubt on it's authenticity?
> >> > It is called historical revisionism and censoring. Very Orwellian,
> > indeed. If, as the article says, they "violate the LDS Church-owned
>school's dress-and-grooming standards", then why did the school recruit this
>athlete > > in the first place? Sounds like a double standard...they want a winning team, but want to hide the truth about the players.
> >
> > Perry
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
<<inline: hoffman2.jpg>>
