Perry wrote: > ... I just cringe when you say (type) that you are > not hear [sic] to teach LDS theology, then you teach > LDS theology.
I understand Dave to be saying that the reason he is here is not to teach LDS theology. In other words, his purpose for being here is not to proselytize or teach others about Mormonism. That does not mean that he will never teach LDS theology while he is here. I really don't understand your problem with this. It is kind of like stopping at a gas station for gas, but then after you are there you decide to buy a coke. Did you go to the gas station for gas or a coke? It seems reasonable to me that if people are going to ask Dave about his beliefs, or if he is being challenged about his beliefs, then he might share what his beliefs are, even if they are LDS in origin. Such does not mean that his reason for being here has changed anymore than someone would argue that you stopped at the gas station for a coke just because you bought one. Your real motivation was to get gas, not to get a coke. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
