|
I’ve heard this “logorrhea” J before and I looked-into the legitimacy of it for a length of time. I’m not so sure
any longer and I may be the loner on this one, too. I just
need to linger on your lingo a little longer before I can lunge into a loquacious lecture. Please be longanamous with me. Make sure your two
or three Scriptural witnesses line up before levying laudation (or liability for that matter) to the
Spirit of YHVH. --slade -----Original
Message----- Slade, speaking of
prophecy, I felt all day like the Holy Spirit was saying to me over and over,
“The physical is just the manifestation of the spiritual.” In other
words, spiritual reality eventually must manifest itself in the physical.
It has been a long, busy day, and I just got home, so I haven’t even had time
to contemplate what tht might mean. But one thing struck me, that if that
is true, then the fact that Jesus came in the flesh only shows how very much
the Father was here with us in Spirit prior to that. And how much He
loved us, that He had to manifest in the Flesh what was already true in the
Spirit. I will be really busy the next couple of days, but would appreciate any
input on this thought. Izzy Another way of rendering the verse is: No
prophecy of Scripture is to be interpreted by an individual on his own
-- or -- No prophecy of Scripture comes from
an individual’s own decision – but this rendering makes v. 20 the
same thing as v. 21 and does not contribute to the ground being laid in verses
19-21 for the argument against the false prophets of Chapter 2. A prophesy of
Scripture must be interpreted not on the basis of thoughts rooted in a person’s
old nature, such as those of the false prophets of Chapter 2, but on the basis
of what the Holy Spirit makes clear about its meaning, since Yeshua sent the
Spirit to guide believers into the truth (John 16.13). Since He sent the Spirit
to the believers as a community, be cautious of those who offer “the
true word” but avoid subjecting their opinions to the scrutiny of other
believers. Much false teaching, both in Peter’s day and our own, Arises from
people’s developing their own idiosyncratic interpretations, supposedly hearing
the Spirit of the Holy One but without examining other views or admitting that
their own could be a mistake. Prophecies are not to be subjected to eisegesis
but to exegesis. Moreover, the exegete ought not to make interpretation of
prophesy a vehicle for self-aggrandizement and self-exaltation, gaining a
reputation at the expense of perverting Holy Writ. -- slade |
Title: jt: Did he see it or was he told it
- Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Knpraise
- [TruthTalk] Jewish baptism ShieldsFamily
- [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Slade Henson
- [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] 1 Cor. 10:8 Knpraise

