The scriptual reference that God promises his people a
'peaceful dwelling place' needs to be taken in context. Did God make sure
there were no mosquitos in this area as well? No poisonous snakes?
Did God abolish death and aging in these dwellings? Was it God saying that
He would keep them from being attacked by enemies? We live in a
world that is as fallen as the rest of us. Creation groans out in
travail. Weather is a natural part of creation. That includes a nice
gentle shower for your tulips and a massive tornado, some pretty snowflakes and
the flash flood.
I would continue to suggest that the story of Jesus
rebuking the storm was about something different than weather control for
Christians. I think that you may have hit the nail on the head when you
mention fear and peace. For the record God (Jesus) was not concerned about
the storm in the least. It was the disciples who were
concerned.
A contingent universe is one that is based upon and upheld
by its Creator. It is created to run self-sufficiently but relies upon
Jesus Christ in whom all things move and have their being.
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judith H Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
I don't have a concordance with me so I can't give the scriptural reference
but God does promise his people that they will live in "peaceful dwelling
places" with no fear that harm will befall them. I hardly see this
as akin to living in the path of one of these deadly storms. Didn't Jesus
admonish the disciples for being full of fear when he slept and they trembled
during the storm on the sea of Galillee? If God sent that storm surely
Jesus wouldn't have thwarted His Will by commanding "Peace, be still!"
since he always did and said what he first saw the Father do and say during His
earthly ministry. I'm not sure I am where Michael is, but I appreciate him
in the Lord and I know passivity and unbelief are not the answer. What is a
"contingent universe" (don't have a dictionary here either)?
We are meeting people fleeing these storms everywhere in our travels. Today
we are in Buffalo TX and the camper next to us is people who live in Tallahassee
FLA. In Arkansas the Campgrounds were full all the way up to Little
Rock. To me this gives new meaning to the idea that in the end times men's
hearts will fail them for fear. It is escalating. Grace and
Peace, judyt
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:19:39 -0400 "Hughes Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Hi Michael,Not that John needs me to defend him in any way but you are constructing your theology from one experience Jesus had with his disciples. I would suggest you re-read the story and ask yourself if the story is really about Jesus dissolving storms or if perhaps the story is narrated to us for a different purpose. To assert that John is a fatalist and actually question whether he is a believer (by the question marks you pose after his signature) is ridiculous. I understand that you are passionate about the topic and desire to see people saved from these dreadful storms. That is all something we on this forum can see and honor you for. What becomes a problem is when you create a theology (read mythology) behind it. When Jesus prays "thy kingdom come' you imply that He is referring to God stopping storms. This is your definition of what the Kingdom would be like. When God tells the Israelites that He 'will heal their land' you imply that this means God will stop storms from assaulting us. This is your definition of a healed land. To imagine that this is what the writers were actually referring to is almost laughable. In a way you have us all by the neck. You can ask if we believe God can do things. All of us will answer yes of course He can. Then you jump to, well than if we pray enough He will. If we don't pray the way you do it is implied that we are guilty of not agreeing with God and scripture. The argument you make is tough for people to get their heads around. It sounds so simple and very matter of factly puts one group in the believers side and the other to the non-believers side. Who wouldn't want to be on the believers side? Terry and John are both believers that hold to the word of God. They believe (as do I) that God created a contingent universe.Jonathan Hughes
This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Thank you for your cooperation in connection with the above.
Ce courriel ainsi que tous les documents s’y rattachant contiennent de l’information confidentielle et privilégiée. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, s.v.p. en informer immédiatement son expéditeur par retour de courriel, effacer le message et détruire toute copie (électronique ou autre). Toute diffusion ou utilisation de cette information par une personne autre que le destinataire visé est interdite et peut être illégale. Merci de votre coopération relativement au message susmentionné.
