|
Jeff, for my two cents I believe knowing
Hebrew and the Hebraic culture, etc., is a VERY good thing. Not indispensable
to faith in Christ, but a valuable asset indeed. I simply don’t get into
haggling about a lot of theological arguments that I consider nonessential, and
therefore not worth dividing over. Iz From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Powers Well now, you say that
Slade and I are not plain spoken, I disagree. The fact that Slade and I
use Hebrew is not the issue here! We always provide the english
meanings. THAT my dear lady IS becoming all things to all people! The mere fact that we are
more comfortable with Hebrew does not negate the message or our way of
conveying it. In fact, the way I see it, by using the Hebrew (along with
english translations) is a way of educating people. That is not a Greek
versus Hebrew mindset issue. The issue is that few westerners know
or understand the Semitic way of thought. If they did many people would
see scripture in a whole new light. The language one
reads scripture in is up to the readers ability to read fluently in any
language. However, without some background in the culture in which scripture
came about, most people miss the beauty, the humor, the very life of
scripture. Sure many can and are saved without this background
information, but they all remain Babies in the Lord. What many think of as meat
is in reality pablum. That is barely one small step up from milk. But you
haven't graduated to meat yet! Not a problem, in the world to come, you
will all be consuming meat. And WE will all be begging each others forgiveness
over issues that we fail to understand today. In some
respects I sense a bit of hostility over scholarship (education) from some
people. This is a tragedy! Something that many of you will fail to
understand, in the semitic mindset/worldview, etc. study is one of the
highest forms of worship. Paul told Timothy to "Study to show yourself
approved...". But what did Timothy have to study? It
wasn't the Newer Testament. Nor was Paul telling him to study Plato or
Socrates, etc. It was the Older Testament along with the teaching of his
Rabbi. What did his Rabbi teach? Torah in the plain language
of the day. Using exegetical and hermeunetical methods that made the
teaching fuller, easier to understand. It seems to me that preachers
today still attempt to use these methods! You say that
Paul had a better education "after the flesh..." than anyone.
Well, Paul studied at the feet of Gamaliel, I am sure that his studies
were not after the flesh as you have misconstrued the meaning of this
passage. Jeff
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spirit Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The S... Jeff Powers
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. T... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Judy Taylor
- [TruthTalk] www.Bushvideo.com ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] www.Bushvideo.com Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] www.Bushvideo.com ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] www.Bushvideo.com Jonathan Hughes
- RE: [TruthTalk] www.Bushvideo.co... ShieldsFamily
- [TruthTalk] Kerry and Aborti... Jonathan Hughes
- RE: [TruthTalk] Kerry and Ab... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Grammar & Worldview vs. The Spiri... Judy Taylor

