I will note that my copied comment below is not a contradiction to Lances. I think that deegan has a concern for others that speaks louder than his antics often do. The question posed by Lance is as interesting a one as I have read in a while.
Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 05:29:43 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apologetic for the eternal sonship of Christ
IMO both Kevin and Perry's motivation is that of a genuine concern for those who do not apprehend Jesus as He is. To note the difference in style is simply to note the difference in makeup of each of the TT participants.
The Jesus you articulate is not even a 'distant cousin' to the Jesus they articulate. Thankfully, God looks on the heart. You may be among those who have broken the 'articulation boundary'. He alone knows.
Surely gentlemen you've not failed to note the dissimilarity between your Jesus'?
Were you to be given the assignment of writing but a few paragraphs outlining that difference, could you do so? Will you do so?
looking forward to it,
Lance
----- Original Message -----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: July 02, 2005 01:55Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apologetic for the eternal sonship of ChristIn a message dated 7/1/2005 8:02:52 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I do not say that all SP is foolish. But, if deegan mirrors the attitudes expressed here on TT toward the Mormons he preaches against on the streets, he is not acting as Jesus would have him act.Blainerb: Kevin usually tries to ridicule/attack/nullify/gainsay whatever good things we say, and if that is not possible, he ridicules/attacks anyone who tries to say anything positive about us. I hate to say this, but I get the impression most (but not all) of you cave in to Kevin, just so he won't attack you as he does us. I guess it is better to sooth the beast than fight it, huh?
