Perry, do you understand that such a defense would arrive at no solution at all!!??  The discussion would just go on and on  -  as it has in the past.   I am not interested in such, any more.   In my miond, there is an evil spirit spirit present in such a continue discussion.   I have made my point and given at least one defense.  Ditto for DM  -  time to move on.  MY words, at least, are an extention of who I am.   Maybe no one here on TT agrees but that consideration is of no consequence to my way of thinking on this matter.
 
Jd 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:27:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ad-hominem discussion

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> ... I was neither meaningless nor repetitive in my posted comments. 
 
John, 
 
  Your statement above is a good start at resolving this issue. I think your best defense would be to argue the point that your comment was not a "meaningless tautology", bringing in evidence to refute David's assertion, rather then arguing that calling it such was an ad-hominem attack. 
 
Perry 
 
---------- 
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org 
 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. 

Reply via email to