|
As to #1, I am saying that.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 02, 2005 05:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
ALL are elect in Jesus!!!!!!!! This is
God's 'ONE TRUE PURPOSE'!
Are you saying that ALL/everyone is in
Christ because you believe that this is God's one true purpose
Lance?
Other than the 'heart' of JD and the 'lyrical'
contributions of 'G', TT is 'bout ready to dry up and blow away.
This depends on how one defines "LIFE"
Lance - You JD, and G are of the same spirit so I understand why you
would say this.
However, the ramblings of Dylan are not the
key to the door of heaven, I'll leave it at that.
NOTE TO JD: CBK is in town and, I'm listening
to the March Wauchope presentation whilst driving to and from. I'm going to
see him later today if you've got any comments/questions you wish to pass
along.
Again , you make comment that has little to do with what I have
written. At least you are consistent.
You really like the sound of the "narrow road" thingy, don'e
you? I prefer the part that says there are so many, they
cannot be counted.
JD From:
Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
So?
We may be at different places in our pilgrimage
but are basically travelling the same
road which is the
narrow path with he strait gate. Whereas
others on TT appear to be breathing
rarified air and on the
broad road ... jt
I have a definition and fully understand what "judgmentalism" is. Nothing double
tongued about it. Give me your definition and I'll
share mine. The clear reason why you Wingers refuse
to present a list of doctrines upon which we must all
agree has to do with the impossibility of the matter --
your list, Deegan's list, Judy's list or DM's
list would not be the same !!! So you all pretend to agree
with each other while refusing, at the same time, to offer specifics as
to this mythological list. You judge others to hell but
refuse to be
accountable. &n bsp; Ditto on this definition for judgmentalism. You all cannot
give a definition that does not find yourselves at fault.
But I already knew this.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: ShieldsFamily
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:56:19
-0500 Subject: RE: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community
for homosecuality
How can you be so double-tongued, JD? You accuse me
of that all the time!!! iz
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and why bring up the word anyway
- no one on the right has a clue as to its definition. Hard
to accuse someone of it when you
don't know what it is.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Kevin Deegan < openairmission@yahoo.com> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:29:17 -0700
(PDT) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for
homosexuality
And your Judgemental too!
Is your Brand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed in
the People's Republique of
CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK, Kevin,
y'all SPEW! JD has recognized this
'bout y'all since I bin on TT.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
15:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Stop being so HATEfull Lance. Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the head',
Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches'
of His day. That ring any bells with any of you out there? (Judy,
Kevin, Iz) At
whom/with whom do we see His anger most expressed? At whom/with
whom do we see the opposite? Why look, it's the very ones y'all choose to hate, demonstrate against etc. Hmmmmmmmmmm strange
hugh? Do we all read
the sa me Bible?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't
you talking about the "gay issue?" We are supposed to
minister the way Jesus did as He is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie He confronted the rich young ruler
with his heart of covetousness which he was not
yet willing to part with. Jesus didn't chase after him and
keep talking about grace. He did minister to those God showed
Him and warned them to go and sin no more lest a
worse thing
come upon them. But He didn't minister to everyone he
met.
Today we take sin so lightly because we don't believe
God means what He says or that the chaos in our lives is rooted
in sin and unrighteousness. God is supposed to bless this mess because of grace, because he loves us
so much and this
is the lie. He will not do it
because to do
so He would have to violate His own Word. You can talk
grace till the cows
come home but until this person hears the truth
and is willing to repent from the heart God will not honor
your words JD.
Well, maybe
God has put us together "for such a time as
this." Right now the relationship
is something of a novelty -- at least
for him. My conversation with him is different
from "the others." So, maybe I might be
able to make sense to him. What I am not
doing is talking about the gay issue, per se. He is but
I am trying to get him to stop and examine what it
means when it says that "Christ died for us while we were
YET sinners." My concern is that he
understand the gospel of grace and , and, and, what it
really mean s to be "saved." The new birth
will produce - given time
............... so that is where I begin
-----------&n bsp; with the new birth.
JD ====================================
I wish you well. Terry
|
