DAVEH: I'm sorry you feel that way, Perry. I thought it to be pretty
well understood my most clear thinking Americans that asking that
(smoking) question is a joking way to point out the ludicrousness of
what they said. It was not at all intended to imply that either you or
Dean were dopers.....just that your claims are pretty wild, as if you
can't discern reality. My apologies if I failed to convey that message
so that you (and Dean) could understand it.
BTW.........I pretty much know that both you and Dean are stone cold
sober, but I fail to understand why you are so sensitive. I did not
call either of you a doper....I just asked what you were smoking. The
proper answer had you wanted to give it would have been,
"nothing".....to clear the smoke from the air. Instead, both of you
apparently have taken offense, assuming the opposite of what any
half-witted kid would fully understand. Yet, Dean called me a pagan and
you did not utter a peep as far as I know. As you know, I've got a
pretty thick skin, and have come to expect such from some TTers, so I
don't feel the need to cry foul at the ad hom. I just find it
interesting that you guys can dish it out, but seem to get all confused
and choke on that which is returned.....even when it is a joke.
FTR......Again I apologize for damaging your sensitivities, Perry.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you asked Dean what he had been smoking. That is tantamount to
calling him a drug user. You accused me of the same.
*_/As for turning the other cheek each time you insult me (drug
user,backstabber,...etc) I ignor it and still bring Jesus to you.
/_*
DAVEH: Are you hallucinating again, Dean? I never insulted you by
calling you a drug user, or backstabber. I certainly might have
asked you what you were smoking, as some of the claims you make are
so screwed up that they sound as if they are from somebody who's mind
has been influenced by drugs. But...I'm pretty sure you aren't a
doper, despite sounding like one at times. And again FTR.....I
never claimed you are a backstabber.
Dean Moore wrote:
DAVEH: I think it might be remotely related to the Lord talking
about turning the other cheek. Or....could that /judge not that
ye be not judged/ passage have some relevance.....?
*_cd: Why do lost people always fall back to "you are
judging" as
their defense".DaH, It more correctly means "not to judge harshly"
or you will be judged in the same manner.How can one decide right
from wrong if he does not judge the matter. Can't I call a child
molester a child molester. Can't I say "look at that lost man
molesting that child" and call out "Hey someone stop that child
molester"? Is he fair to yell back" You are judging me so you sin
not I". Who would be in the wrong DaH- the molester or I?/As for
turning the other cheek each time you insult me (drug
user,backstabber,...etc) I ignor it and still bring Jesus to you.
/_
*Dean Moore wrote:
In your heart you feel your way is the right way, and in TT
there is room for the wrong way....which is a conflict in
your paradigm. At least that's the way I see it......do you
see it in similar light?
*cd; I am against anything that exalts itself against
God-your religion does that. When must Christians give room
for the wrong way? Where in the Bible are we told to do
this????????
*
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
