:)
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:54:24 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes; note/correction, ff.:On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:53:50 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I can dig up the reference for this statement -- but who in the world thinks this is some kind of problem? ..the 22 [apparently/actually out of 260 wks, over a 5 yr period] weeks was certainly not talking about all of this body of work...
||
