> [Original Message]
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 11/29/2005 2:45:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil
man' says Dean Moore
>
> Dean, I have been spending too much time on e-mail and must back off.  I 
> just want to make a few comments.
>
> I am not a fan of Calvin.  Please try to remember that.  In the matter of 
> Calvin and Servetus, I am on the side of Servetus in the sense that I do
not 
> support "thought police."  In other words, I do not support the Council
of 
> Geneva putting Servetus to death.  The difficulty I have about being 
> completely on the side of Servetus is that Servetus himself tried to get
the 
> same council that convicted him to convict and kill Calvin, and to have
all 
> of Calvin's possessions given to him as compensation for all the trouble 
> Calvin caused him.  So I really can't be on either guy's side if all the 
> truth fully be known.

cd: Then maybe we found a middle ground as I don't think much of either one
myself. Maybe we should stop trying to present them as  having good in them
and focus on which is the meanest:-)
>
> In regards to Arminius, you are confusing "Calvinism" with "Calvin." 
> Arminius considered John Calvin a brother in Christ and greatly supported 
> his writings.  What he was against was the Calvinists who were twisting 
> Calvin's writings to their own purpose.  I recommend you read the Works
of 
> Jacobus Arminius.  It is available for free.  If you download the pdf 
> versions, search for Calvin's name, and see how often Arminius quotes him 
> and relies upon the writings of Calvin to defend himself against his 
> Calvinistic opponents.  In regards to the Creeds, you will see (if my
memory 
> serves me correctly), that he fully supported the Westminster Confession. 
> This Creed was the "biggie."  The other creeds you mentioned are not that 
> relevant in regards to John Calvin.  There is a lot of politics involved 
> here that is sometimes difficult to follow.

cd: I think I have already downloaded Arminius-I find him to be fasinating
and hope to study more of his works.
>
> You should also know that while the modern Calvinists put the order of
our 
> salvation as regeneration / faith / justification, Calvin himself appears
to 
> me and many others to have it faith / regeneration / justification. 
> Therefore, while you might be disagreeing with Calvinists about this
issue 
> of regeneration, you are probably in agreement with John Calvin himself. 
> Calvin can be read about on this in Book 3, Chapter 11 of his Institutes.

cd: Actually Faith/Justification (pardoned)/regenaration makes more sense
to me. So I have no agreement with J. Calvin.
>
> In regards to your comment about Calvin's will.  I'm not sure you are 
> interpreting his quote right.  When Calvin speaks of his exhortation, he
is 
> simply accepting responsibility... "yes, I exhorted the council to do 
> something about this man."  Part of the law was that the accuser had to
go 
> to prison too in case the accusations were false.  It was Calvin's
personal 
> secretary who played this role of accuser and went to prison.  I have no 
> doubt of Calvin's culpability in the matter.  The problem is when we 
> characterize it as Calvin murdering Servetus.  That's not what happened. 
> Calvin exhorted the authorities to do something about this man in their 
> city.  The city took it from there, judging and executing Servetus.

cd: You know my view on that already.
>
> If you read Calvin's writings, he was not at all happy with how Geneva
was 
> progressing.  He despised the lack of liberty, and was himself 
> excommunicated from the city for 3 years with his buddy Farel who Judy
had 
> quoted.  There is no doubt that the Geneva "experiment" was a failure,
but 
> to lay it all at Calvin's feet is not right because it is not accurate. 
> People talk like Calvin was the mayor, or the pope, or some great
official. 
> He was not even a citizen.  He was a lawyer and preacher in town.  His
power 
> was to excommunication only, and the city even did not allow him to
exercise 
> that the way he wanted.

cd: I maintain:To make decrees shows power David.
>
> You mentioned John Wesley and say that faith must be present for 
> regeneration.  Yet, surely you are aware that John Wesley believed in and 
> practiced infant baptism.  How does an infant have faith?  Wesley
believed 
> in baptismal regeneration and practiced it.  When John Wesley wrote what
you 
> quoted, he was talking about what happens when an adult believes and
enters 
> baptism and is only addressing a particular situation, not his
perspective 
> overall of regeneration / faith / justification.  He does not even use
the 
> word regeneration there.

cd: For me child baptism is a way of bringing children with unholy parents
into the church-later they can decide on faith as wisdom comes. Job also
offered sacrifices up to God for his children. 1 Cor.7:14, Acts 2:39,
>
> You mentioned that you had a goal of clearly defining the difference
between 
> Calvin and Arminius.  Perhaps what you really should do is contrast 
> Calvinism and Arminianism.  I am not resisting your efforts, but only
trying 
> to help you accurately portray history.  I don't think characterizing
Calvin 
> as being someone with murderous hatred, or as someone who murdered
Servetus, 
> is a good way of presenting that contrast.  Stick with the modern 
> disciplines of Calvinism and Arminianism and perhaps your goal will be
more 
> readily realized.

cd: while I believe there was some "drifting" from the origional thoughts
of Calvin-I find that the "TULIP" is from the teaching of Calvin.
>
> I really am interested in conversing more, but I have lots of work here
to 
> do and some research concerning my preaching campaign at the University
of 
> Florida.  I hope you understand.

cd: I understand and hope God is with you in your stand against the U of M.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to