|
When you describe that which you say as THE TRUTH
OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as OTHER THAN the truth of
the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the very thing that you speak of as
'both discouraging and wearying'. Would you not acknowledge this to be the
case?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 14, 2005 07:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
Standard
We should make accusing each other personally
a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to be both
discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or
not?
Why give the enemy a platform to tear each
other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my posts,
Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual experiences. I'm
talking about Christian hypocrisy and the double
standard as practiced on TT. Is the double standard on TT not a
fair topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter
offline? Is this not relevant to all TTers,
Perry?
I find it very telling that you make
false accusations against me.......
you suggest I might have some
knowledge of Izzy's sexual experiences,
.........which I did not
do. Go back and read my exact words if you don't believe me. If
you can't find them, I'll gladly provide them and you can see for yourself
that you are again accusing me of something I did not do.
you
suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some
sexual connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on
TT by other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage such
comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something other TTers
can post with no retribution. This is simply another example of a
double standard.
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets
"excited" by sexual references.
.........I merely stated the
truth about Deans sensitivity to such things. This was not an
ad-hom attack. Is the truth now a problem on TT? People
have said a lot more vile things about me with no condemnation by the
moderator. Why the double standard now, Perry?
these
amount to false accusations,
DAVEH: How can that
possibly be a false accusation if it is true, Perry? If
anything, it is you who is making false accusations
about me in this matter. Once again....a TT double
standard.
the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned
topic
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong again,
Perry. You simply fail to understand the nature of my posts. My
intentions are not to spin up Dean at all. It is you who I am
trying to enlighten as to the Christian hypocrisy involving the double
standard practiced on TT with regard to Mormons. Until you as
the moderator recognize it, why should I discontinue pointing it out every
time it occurs? Is not the TT double standard an acceptable discussion
topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's
sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying "one of Joseph
Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation, then
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by
sexual references. These amount to false accusations,
with the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic.
Any more posts from you containing sexual references and I will have to
take you off the forum until you agree not to do so. Take any issues you
have up with me, offline, at this address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue, 13
Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain /from
making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this, Perry.
Recently I asked some questions that were no more sexually oriented than
what you commonly make, Dean then claimed foul......and you banned
further discussion based on the /perception /you and Dean had about what
those comments might have implied.
Now you have
made a comment that can be perceived to be sexually charged..........
*If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to recognize the double
standard? It is interesting that when you or other TTers make any
kind of denigrating remarks toward LDS theology with sexual
implications, nothing is considered off limits. When I point out
this obvious double standard, I am cautioned by the moderator to
/refrain /from bringing the discussion to the TT table under the guise
of making/ false accusations/. It must be convenient to have a
moderator who can see non-LDS posters through one non-judgmental eye,
and perceive a completely different perspective of LDS posters through
the other, more critical eye. I suppose if one has an ax to grind
against LDS theology, and is not embarrassed to publicly admit
such....then it should not surprise anybody to find that person
practicing a double standard. The curious part about this is that
it happens on a forum called /TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed
to be the dominating factor, yet it seems to be suppressed when it comes
to recognizing the Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry
Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain
/from making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.* This
is not the forum for that? I am sure there are many discussion forums
about sex if that type of discussion interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you
may become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is going to rebuke you
for making such sexually suggestive comments, Perry! If
not, will we then have another example of hypocritical Christianity
in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret
password and secret handshake so Joseph Smith will allow you
entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may become one of his many
spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon, 12
Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got to
know you, Christine--but hope to meet you in the
great
beyond--you may be required to testify at the Bar of God as to
what you
have seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In
a message dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked
into the world of TT, and I think it
would be
beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the
discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the Lord
bless you and keep you all.
It would be cool to
meet you all in real life some day. But maybe not all in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
